How does bidirectional context in BERT differ from unidirectional context in GPT?
PICTURE THIS: A SENTENCE BECOMES TOKENS
The model does not read letters like humans. It reads these pieces, then predicts the next one.
Simple meaning
BERT sees tokens on both sides of a masked position, which helps disambiguation for NLU.
WHY — Tokens instead of words?
LLMs use tokens (not full words) because it helps them:
question about GPT vs BERT.
trade-offs, and what you would actually do on a GenAI / LLM project - not buzzwords.
Each piece maps to a number the network can learn.
Fixed pieces are what transformers expect as input.
STEPS — What happens with tokens?
Before the model can read a sentence, it goes through these steps:
- 1BERT sees tokens on
both sides of a masked position, which helps disambiguation for NLU.
- 2GPT may only see
the left context when predicting the next token, which matches generation.
- 3That training difference, not
just size, drives the typical use cases.
- 4Context mix
Attention looks at nearby tokens together.
- 5Next token
The model scores what should come next.
- 6Decode
IDs turn back into readable text.
EXAMPLE — See it in action
Let's see how a real sentence is tokenized (tokens may vary by model):
Note: Actual tokens and IDs depend on the tokenizer (e.g., GPT, Llama, etc.).
Key takeaway
BERT sees tokens on both sides of a masked position, which helps disambiguation for NLU. GPT may only see the left context when predicting the next token, which matches generation.